The Committee on Teaching Quality (CTQ) met 8 times during the
academic year. The following summarizes our discussion of and
participation in various issues.
- "Celebration of Teaching." This idea was first proposed in
1991-92 by then Dean of Undergraduate Studies Michael Butler, and
strongly endorsed by CTQ. Discussion continued during 1992-93, and
concluded in a vote of support from the Executive Committee of the
Academic Senate. This year, the prospect of corporate funding for new
campus teaching awards brought this issue back to attention of the
Academic Senate. CTQ argued for and strongly endorses the Executive
Committee vote in favor of a "Celebration of Teaching," as opposed to
a "Celebration of Faculty Excellence." Chair Valletta worked with
Susan Bryant, Chair of the Committee on Scholarly Honors and Awards,
to help develop an event proposal, as overseen by Senate Chair
Danziger. As of the end of the year, however, development of the
event is in limbo, and outside funding does not appear to be
forthcoming.
For the second year, the final meeting of the Campus Teaching
Colloquy on June 7 consisted of the "Celebration of Teaching." This
was a festive afternoon event at the University Club, and it honored
faculty and graduate student recipients of campuswide, school, and
department teaching awards. In the future, we recommend that this
event occur in the evening, in a more formal setting, with resource
support from the Academic Senate. A higher profile event will
highlight the emphasis placed on teaching at UC Irvine.
-
"The Discovery University." We discussed this issue at length, at
several meetings. We focused on discussing how widespread
undergraduate projects of a significant nature are likely to be, given
our current resources and student body. Many members supported the
idea of encouraging additional undergraduate research and creative
projects, particularly if such activities are supported by campus
resources but are not mandated as requirements by central
administration.
On the other hand, several members expressed skepticism about
the ability and training of undergraduates to conduct useful projects.
Also, several members were deeply opposed to the use of the moniker
"The Discovery University," which they felt was not grammatical and
not sufficiently dignified. Chair Valletta served on the Educational
Initiatives Subcommittee of the Executive Committee, and communicated
these views during subcommittee and Executive Committee discussion.
-
Teaching Colloquy.
CTQ continued its co-sponsorship of the Campus
Teaching Colloquy, which provides members of the campus community an
opportunity to be informed about and discuss various issues related to
teaching at UCI. Nine Colloquy meetings occurred during 1994-95. At
the first meeting, newly appointed Executive Vice Chancellor Golub
shared his views about teaching. Later meetings discussed performance
aspects of teaching, educational technology, distance learning,
undergraduate research, acad emic dishonesty, writing in all
disciplines, and teaching upper-division writing. The final meeting
served as the campus "Celebration of Teaching."
CTQ also aided
Instructional Development Services (IDS) Acting
Director Gallow in planning a tentative complete agenda for next
year's Colloquy. The planned topics include: An Introduction to
Teaching at UCI, Technology and Instructional Strategies, Changes in
Affirmative Action, Collaborative Learning, Preparation of High School
Students, TA Supervision and Training, Mentoring Graduate Students for
the Academic Job Market, Distance Learning, and the "Celebration of
Teaching."
-
Distance Learning. CTQ met at the Media Services Building for a
presentation and discussion of distance learning technology, which
complemented a Teaching Colloquy presentation on the same topic. We
reviewed tapes from a graduate course taught by a CTQ member
(Prof. Barrett) that utilized the technology to teach the course to
students at UC Riverside also.
Members discussed the applications and limitations of the
technology. Widespread use in undergraduate courses appears
undesirable. The technology appears to be most useful for small
graduate seminars in specialized areas that are not covered on all UC
campuses. Currently, and perhaps in the future, the cost of the
technology appears to place sharp limits on extensive use. Finally,
we note that its greatest potential for the future may lie in the
teaching of "self-paced" courses in which student intera ction with
teaching resources is critical. This application may become
particularly important with widespread availability of home terminals
with attached audio/video devices.
-
Outside employment policy. CTQ discussed this proposal for
University of California policy and made several recommendations for
modification, to both wording and content. These recommendations were
incorporated into the UCI Academic Senate response to the proposal.
-
Campus teaching support resources -- "Teaching How to Teach."
Acting IDS Director Gallow gave a presentation concerning resources
available at UCI to help faculty and graduate students develop their
teaching skills. Most of these resources are available through
IDS.
Dr. Gallow emphasized the confidential, non-evaluative nature of
IDS/faculty consultations. Currently, these services are mostly used
on an individual basis. We recommend that departments more actively
seek out connections to IDS programs, to promote the culture of
teaching on campus. The first Teaching Colloquy meeting of 1995-96
will provide an orientation to campus teaching development resources.
-
Testing. We discussed the various forms that testing takes on
campus. Members noted that multiple choice and true/false questions
are ideal test formats only under very limited conditions. We
encourage faculty to avoid such questions whenever resources allow it.
This view may be particularly relevant as UCI increasingly adopts the
principles of "The Discovery University," with its emphasis on active
discovery of reasoning methods, as opposed to passive comprehension of
concepts. Several members no ted their success in using TAs to help
grade essay-type exams in large courses.
-
Chair Activities. Chair Valletta engaged in several tasks in
addition to those listed above. Along with several other academic
senate chairs and Chair Danziger, Valletta attended campus Enrollment
Council meetings, to provide Senate input into campus enrollment
decisions. At the request of Acting Dean of Undergraduate Studies
McWilliams, Chair Valletta also chaired the IDS Director Search
Committee. That committee met several times, interviewed candidates,
and made recommendations to Acting Dean Mc Williams concerning the new
Director and other matters related to IDS operations.