Prof. Clare Yu

Glasses: Very Sluggish Liquids or Real Solids?

Clare Yu

Is glass a liquid or a solid? Everyday experience says the answer is obviously ``solid.'' But suppose you start with a molten glass and cool it down slowly. At what temperature does it become a solid? Certainly the colder it gets, the more viscous it becomes. Eventually the molecules become so sluggish that you get tired of waiting for them to flow and you declare it to be a solid. But at no temperature is there a dramatic change in phase from liquid to solid.

This is quite different from the case of freezing water to make ice. As you cool water, there will come a point when it suddenly crystallizes to form ice. This is an example of a phase transition. A ``phase transition'' occurs when a system undergoes a transformation from one phase to another. There are different types of phase transitions. Going from water to ice is an example of a ``first order phase transition.'' Typically a first order phase transition is associated with a latent heat and a volume change; ice expands. There are also second order phase transitions whose hallmark is a diverging thermodynamic quantity. When a paramagnet is cooled and becomes a ferromagnet (see the magnets on your refrigerator door for examples of a ferromagnet), it undergoes a second order phase transition and the magnetic susceptibility diverges. Another example of a second order phase transition is when an ordinary metal becomes a superconductor at low temperatures.

So we can rephrase our question about glasses and ask, ``Is the glass transition a phase transition?'' We can rule out the possibility of a first order phase transition since there is no latent heat or abrupt volume change. But could the glass transition be a second order phase transition? This has been a longstanding question for both physicists and chemists. Some have argued that there is no real phase transition; that a glass is simply a very, very viscous liquid. Others have speculated that it is a second order phase transition but the problem is that no one has been able to find a thermodynamic quantity that diverges.

Recently, my postdoc, Dr. Herve Carruzzo, and I have indeed found evidence that the glass transition is a second order phase transition. We have been performing numerical (molecular dynamics) simulations of a glass--forming liquid consisting of a mixture of big balls and little balls. We have found the first evidence of a diverging thermodynamic quantity. It is a rather esoteric quantity that is related to the nonlinear compressibility. The compressibility of a substance tells us how easy it is to change its volume. The higher the compressibility, the squishier it is. One way to measure the compressibility of a substance is to change the pressure on it and measure its change in volume. In fact one could plot the volume versus the pressure. If the plot were a straight line, minus the slope of this line would be the linear compressibility. For real materials the plot will be a curve which can be fit to a polynomial. The coefficient of the linear term is the linear compressibility; the coefficients of the nonlinear terms are the higher order compressibilities. At the glass transition the linear compressibility does not diverge but has a maximum. However, the nonlinear compressibilities do diverge, and this indicates that the glass transition is in fact a second order phase transition. So, in terms of our original question, glass may really be a solid after all.


Prof. Clare Yu, cyu@moses.ps.uci.edu